Here is an interesting
phrase, “taking time off” because one can not really ever turn time off. What we mean is "time out" from the usual and ordinary, perhaps to invest in the unusual and extraordinary. Like it says in the old ads for Timex, it just keeps on
ticking and one day, we will run out of time, or walk out, or lie down and
check out. Think of some of the
amusing ways people speak about time.
“I didn’t have time to do it.”
What they really mean is they did not choose to take the time to do it,
whatever “it” was, but who is going to say that? How about this one? “It’s time to eat.”
That was mother calling from the kitchen. Whether you were actually hungry or not didn’t matter. It was “time” for breakfast, lunch or
dinner. One family I knew quite
well, not my own, sat down precisely at 5:30 PM every evening for dinner and
everyone was expected to be there and be on time. Being “on time” is highly important to many people but
different cultures regard that behavior with more or less value. Personal priorities about being “on
time” may also vary.
Researchers have found that individuals are divided in two groups in the ways they approach time. The Iowa State University Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning puts it this way:
"Monochronic individuals are those who
prefer to complete one task at a time. For them, task-oriented time is
distinguished from socio-emotional time. In other words, there is a time
to play and a time to work. These individuals value punctuality,
completing tasks, and keeping to schedules. They view time as if it were
linear, that is, one event happening at a time. Examples of monochronic
cultures include the U.S., Israel, Germany, and Switzerland.Polychronic individuals, on the other hand, are more flexible about time schedules; they have no problem integrating task-oriented activities with socio-emotional ones. For them, maintaining relationships and socializing are more important than accomplishing tasks. These individuals usually see time in a more holistic manner; in other words, many events may happen at once. Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa are places where the polychronic orientation prevails.
In certain cities in the U.S., it is not uncommon for us to find timetables or daily schedules for buses or trains. If the bus is to be at a certain stop at 10:09 PM, for example, one can expect that to happen at the designated time, give or take a minute.
For polychronic individuals such precise timetables are mind-boggling, as many of them are simply used to going to the bus stop and waiting – not knowing whether they will be waiting for five or forty-five minutes. That is just the way things are.
This difference in time orientation is reflected in the complaints of U.S. business people conducting business in Saudi Arabia or in Mexico, for example. A big source of frustration for them is the difficulty of getting through a meeting’s agenda. That is because in these countries meetings begin with an extended socializing time in which time is spent establishing social rapport – usually over many cups of coffee or tea."
We are
often like Pavlov’s dog. The bell
rings and we respond whether by changing activities, answering a call or
checking something in the oven. We
are conditioned and regulated by time.
It’s “time” to go to bed.
It’s “time” to get up. It’s
“time” to go to work. It’s “time
out” and “time” to start again.
It’s “time” for the meeting.
It’s “time” to leave in order to get there in a reasonable amount of
time. It’s all about time and yet
time is an invention, a construct for our convenience and we are bound by
it. How we measure time and how we
use it reveals an enormous amount about who we are as individuals and who we
are as a culture.
Here’s a
phrase that amuses me because of the double entendre. “It’s about time” we say,
meaning usually that we have waited for some time for something or other to
happen and finally, it has taken place. Whether that expresses gratitude,
relief or annoyance depends upon the context. A long-awaited package arrives at the door and we say, “It’s
about time!” And really, it
is simply that it has taken longer than was expected or desired for the
delivery to be accomplished. Big
deal! Get over it! At least we got the package.
In order to get more done in the same amount of time the phenomenon of
multi-tasking has appeared and it seems to have arrived in conjunction with the
advent of computers that are able to perform several functions at the same
time. Recent research at
Stanford on multi-tasking shows that people who are regularly bombarded with several
streams of electronic information do not pay attention, control their memory or
switch from one job to another as well as those who prefer to complete one task
at a time.
High-tech jugglers are
everywhere – keeping up several e-mail and instant message conversations at
once, text messaging while watching television and jumping from one website to
another while plowing through homework assignments. But after putting about 100 students through a series of
three tests, the researchers realized those heavy media multi-taskers are
paying a big mental price.
When it comes to our brain’s
ability to pay attention, the brain focuses on concepts sequentially and not on
two things at once. In fact, the brain must disengage from one activity in
order to engage in another. And it takes several tenths of a second for the
brain to make this switch. As John Medina, author of “Brain Rules” says: “To
put it bluntly, research shows that we can’t multitask. We are biologically
incapable of processing attention-rich inputs simultaneously.” ( http://brainrules.blogspot.com/2008/03/brain-cannot-multitask_16.html)
When we are in situations
where there are multiple sources of information coming from the external world
or emerging out of memory, we are apparently not able to filter out what's not
relevant to our current goal. That
failure to filter means we are slowed down by that irrelevant
information."
However, that said, there
are examples and instances that may show some exceptions and here is one such
illustration. The song, “The Time
of My Life” which was the music and lyrics used in the final scene of the movie
Dirty Dancing with Patrick Swayze and
Jennifer Grey, was written by Frankie Previte. Previte said: "I received a call from Jimmy
Ienner who asked me to write a song for this little movie. I told him I didn't have the time and
he said, 'Make time. This could change your life.'" Frankie's former bandmate John DeNicola
and his friend Don Marowitz came up with the music for the song. Says Previte,
"I received a track from John and Donny and I wrote the lyric and melody
for the chorus in the car while I was driving along the Garden State Parkway,
going to a studio session for another song."
Here’s the message: Making or taking time to do what is
really important can change your life. The question is, what is really
important? And if you’re driving,
be careful!
No comments:
Post a Comment